562 Midline Versus Off Midline Extraction Site in Laparoscopic Left Sided Colorectal Resections for Colorectal Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Method To evaluate comparative outcomes of off-midline and midline extraction sites in laparoscopic left sided colorectal resections. A systematic search electronic databases bibliographic reference lists was conducted, a combination free text controlled vocabulary adapted to thesaurus headings, operators limits were applied. Studies comparing the Off Midline incisions for specimen resections included. Incisional hernias, surgical site infections, operative time, estimated blood loss, anastomotic leak length hospital stay evaluated outcome parameters. Results We identified 5 studies reporting total 1187 patients (n=486) (n=701) The approach associated with lower post infection (OR 0.71, P=0.68), 0.76,P=0.66), incisional hernia (MD: 0.65,P=0.64) compared approach, however it not statistically significant. There no significant difference time 0.10, P=0.99), intra-operative loss (MD 2.31, P=0.91), post-operative : 0.78, P=0.18) between two groups. Conclusions Off-midline have rates hernias when site. No found this study. Future higher-level research is required further clinical outcomes.
منابع مشابه
KRAS and BRAF mutations in Iranian colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: Mutations in the EGFR signaling pathway play an important role in the development of colorectal cancer (CRC). Mutations in these genes, like KRAS and BRAF, affect the treatment strategies and associated with poor prognosis and relative resistance to anti-EGFR therapies. Our aim was to conduct a systematic and meta-analysis on all studies that have been conducted on the prevalence of...
متن کاملHand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colorectal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic colorectal surgery remains one of the most challenging techniques to learn. METHODS The authors collected studies that have compared hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and open surgery for the treatment of colorectal disease over the past 17 years. Data of interest for HALS and open surgery were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS Twelve studies that included ...
متن کاملLaparoscopic and open colorectal resections for colorectal cancer.
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for colorectal cancer with curative intent. AIM To evaluate the postoperative results of laparoscopic and laparotomic colorectal resections for colorectal cancer. METHODS A retrospective study of a series of 189 patients. The descriptive variables were age and gender, and for outcome were type of resection, number of lymph nodes res...
متن کاملCurative versus palliative treatments for colorectal cancer with peritoneal carcinomatosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
The objective of this study was to provide an up-to-date summary of the current evidence that may be useful for updating guidelines. We comprehensively searched the published literatures and conferences for studies that compared curative with palliative treatments in colorectal cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. The primary outcomes considered in this study were three- and five-year ov...
متن کاملColorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced endoscopic technique that allows en-bloc resection of gastrointestinal tumor. We systematically review the medical literature in order to evaluate the safety and efficacy of colorectal ESD. Patients and methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid, CINAHL, and Cochrane for studie...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of Surgery
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['1365-2168', '0007-1323']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znac269.429